Tuesday, June 29, 2004

EFF Action Alert: Don't Fund the War on File Sharing

You can take action to!

I am writing to express my opposition to the Piracy Deterrence and Education Act of 2004 (PDEA, HR 4077). HR 4077 would divert taxpayer dollars and direct federal law enforcement agencies to fight the entertainment industry's misguided war on file sharing. It would also create the first criminal copyright penalties for people who aren't engaged in willful criminal conduct. Under the law's murky "negligence" standard, a person with 1,000 legally obtained songs could be sent to jail for three years if she fails to lock them up tight enough. I believe that these measures are an egregious misuse of federal resources, and I hope you will oppose this bill.

Copyright holders already have an extraordinary array of legal tools at their disposal for fighting infringement. Copyright law that expands liability to innocents is not the answer to the conflict over P2P.

Instead of criminalizing the activity of 60 million American filesharers, we should be looking for positive solutions that compensate artists. For example, a collective licensing regime could legalize file sharing while generating revenue for artists. Here are several examples of such a plan, two of which can be found in the New York Times:

I am also opposed to HR 4077's proposed "education" program. If government is to educate the public about copyright, the curriculum must be balanced. The public has a broad range of rights to use copyrighted material, and omitting them is misleading and counterproductive.

As a constituent and a taxpayer, I hope you will agree that HR 4077 is an inappropriate use of government resources. Please oppose HR 4077 and instead look for a better way forward. Thank you for your time.

Tuesday, June 22, 2004

Three Cheers for Government Regulation

Congressman Herger recently voted aye for an increase in fines to "curb indecency over the airwaves." Behold H.R. 3717 (aka the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2004)! The Senate version raises the fine by a factor of ten (from $27,500 to $275,000). But the House would not be outdone and went straight to the nice round number of $500,000. Both passed and will be worked out in conference.

But of course a bump to the Federal Minimum Wage would hurt business...

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

Wally on Reagan's Passing

Wally had some kind words for former President Reagan.

"President Reagan's passing is a merciful thing for his family and all of his loved ones," said Congressman Wally Herger. "President Reagan will be remembered as the man most responsible for bringing down the Berlin Wall and the fall of communism. He will go down in history as one of our nation's greatest and most loved leaders."

Herger said that President Reagan was one of the main reasons he ran for public office. "He was a role model for me when I was first elected."

"Ronald Reagan brought hope and a positive attitude to Americans at a time when our nation most needed it during the late 1970s and 1980s," Herger said. He always believed in the American dream."

How Reagan receives credit for the demise of Soviet Communism is wrapped around his deep faith and belief in prayer and the power of God.

Wally Responds: The Patriot Act

Last month I asked Wally in an e-mail if he had voted for the Patriot Act. There is no record of who voted for it since it was a voice vote. It must have been too important to take down who actually voted for it. Well, today came the very heavy response.

Turning now to the USA PATRIOT Act. Thank you, also, for contacting me on this important piece of legislation. Enclosed please find several reports prepared by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service detailing this very important legislation. I hope that you find the information useful.

Enclosed were the following:

While I'm sure this will be great reading, it doesn't really answer my question. I guess I will have to call his office.

Sunday, June 06, 2004

They Work For You

It's like Wally Watch, only bigger, better and applies to every MP in the British House of Commons. They Work For You. It couldn't have been named better.

Thursday, June 03, 2004

Wally Responds: DMCA Reform

DMCA is clearly not an issue that Wally cares or knows a lot about. To be fair, copyright wonking isn't for everyone.

May 26, 2004

Dear Patrick:

Thank you for contacting me regarding legislation to reform the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyrights Act. I appreciate your thoughts on this matter.

As you may know, Digital Rights Management (DRM) refers to the technology that copyright owners use to protect digital media. Generally, the bills are directed at two separate goals. One goal is to increase access to digitally-protected media for lawful purposes. The other attempts to thwart digital piracy and would do so by enhancing civil and criminal sanctions for digital copyright infringement and educating the public about the rights of copyright holders.

Representatives Rick Boucher and Zoe Lofgren have introduced legislation in the 108th Congress to address this issue. H.R. 107, the "Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act of 2003," seeks to amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to provide that the advertising or sale of a mislabeled copy-protected music disc is an unfair method of competition and an unfair and deceptive act or practice. Following introduction, H.R. 107 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

While I do not serve on the committees of jurisdiction over this measure, please be assured I will continue to monitor this issue. Should it come to a vote in the House of Representatives, I will keep your views uppermost in mind.

Again, thank you for contacting me on this important issue. Should you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me in the future.

Sincerely,
Wally

Original Action Alert

Wally Responds: Nuclear Bunker Busters

This Action Alert is from True Majority, and I sent it before Wally Watch was started. But here is Wally's reply:

May 25, 2004

Dear Patrick:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the appropriation of funds for a "robust nuclear earth penetrator" program. While we may not see eye to eye on this important subject, I appreciate hearing from you.

As you may know, H.R. 4546, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2003, specifically directs the Secretaries of Defense and Energy to submit a report on various aspects and intents of the robust nuclear earth penetrator program prior to funds being made available for the program. At this time, no report has been issued by the related departments.

Generally referred to as a "report and wait requirement," Section 3146 of the bill requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the 1) military requirements for the robust nuclear earth penetrator, 2) the nuclear weapons employment policy regarding the robust nuclear earth penetrator, 3) a detailed description of the categories or types of targets that the robust nuclear earth penetrator is designed to hold at risk, and 4) an assessment of the ability of conventional weapons to defeat the same categories and types of targets.

On November 12, 2002, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 4546 with my support. President Bush subsequently signed the bill into law on December 2, 2002.

Again, thank you for contacting me on this subject. Should you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me in the future.

Sincerely,
Wally


Updated Friday, June 4: added link to original action alert.